Clayton Development Co., Inc. v. Falvey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Plaintiff Clayton Development Company, Inc. (Clayton), appeals summary judgment favoring defendants Michael and Christie Falvey (Falvey) on its action on a promissory note. Clayton contends the court erred in holding the action was barred by California antideficiency statutes. Clayton also attacks the attorney fee award favoring Falvey. We affirm.
I
For purposes of Falvey’s motion for summary judgment the parties stipulated:
In 1981 Falvey decided to buy a condominium as an investment from Ascot Park Associates (Ascot), a partnership in which Clayton was a partner. Ascot’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Walker v. Community BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Schoolcraft v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Torrey Pines Bank v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Contractors Labor Pool, Inc. v. Westway Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kearney v. Foley and LardnerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2008
- Olson v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- In Re: Prestige Limited Partnership ConcordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.