Legal Opinion

Kearney v. Foley and Lardner

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 14, 2008No. 3:05-cr-02112PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES [doc. # 50]

M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge.

Defendants Foley and Lardner, LLC, and two individuals, Gregory V. Moser and Larry L. Marshall (collectively “Foley” or “defendants”) 1 seek attorneys’ fees in the amount of $118,331.25 as the prevailing parties in the above-captioned case. Plaintiff opposes the motion contending it is untimely, seeks excessive fees, and attempts to obtain attorneys’ fees for the entire action rather than just that portion of fees associated with the motion to strike…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  2. Chi v. Loyola University Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Sandholm v. KueckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Select Portfolio Servicing v. ValentinoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. AUO Corporation v. Trivale Technologies, LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API