Kearney v. Foley and Lardner
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES [doc. # 50]
M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge.
Defendants Foley and Lardner, LLC, and two individuals, Gregory V. Moser and Larry L. Marshall (collectively “Foley” or “defendants”) 1 seek attorneys’ fees in the amount of $118,331.25 as the prevailing parties in the above-captioned case. Plaintiff opposes the motion contending it is untimely, seeks excessive fees, and attempts to obtain attorneys’ fees for the entire action rather than just that portion of fees associated with the motion to strike…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Chi v. Loyola University Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Sandholm v. KueckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Select Portfolio Servicing v. ValentinoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- AUO Corporation v. Trivale Technologies, LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.