Legal Opinion
United Retail Cleaners & Tailors Ass'n v. Denahan
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 4, 1945No. 307PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
In the trial court plaintiff sued three defendants and obtained a favorable finding against one of them. The losing defendant filed a motion for a new trial which was granted. Plaintiff has appealed on the grounds: (1) that the trial court had no jurisdiction to grant the new trial; (2) that if a new trial was proper, it should have been granted as to all defendants; and (3) that the court was in error in granting the new trial.
The argument that the trial court was without jurisdiction to grant the motion for new trial is based upon the claim that the motion was not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Schuerholz v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Southern Pac. Co. v. KlingeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Marcil v. A. H. Merriman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. StefusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lacy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Nix v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Munsey v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Faggins v. FischerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.