Legal Opinion
Hill v. Hawes
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 3, 1944No. 4PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
This case presents important questions respecting the rule-making power of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia touching appeals to that court and the powers of the District Court of the United *521States for the District of Columbia to vacate its judgments.
Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals, as it stood when applied in this case, was:
“No . . . judgment ... of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, or of any justice thereof, shall be reviewed by the Court of Appeals, unless the appeal shall be taken within 20 days after the . . .…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ex Parte DanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hill v. HawesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
3Cited by131 opinions
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Thomas E. Blunt v. United States of America, Thomas E. Blunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Braden v. University of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.