Riley v. Vilsack
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
For 50 years, Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957), provided the standard for determining the legal sufficiency of a complaint in federal court under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8. Any student of federal civil procedure is familiar with the famous passage from Conley, repeated in countless court decisions over the years: “a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Id. at…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Fagan v. U.S. Carpet Installation, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Iwaszczenko v. Neale (In Re Neale)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Brazill v. California Northstate College of Pharmacy, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Jones v. AIG RISK MANAGEMENT, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.