Ponderosa Fire District v. Coconino County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Judge.
¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether Cocon-ino County, Arizona, the Coconino County Board of Supervisors (“Board”), and the Co-conino County Community Development Department (collectively “the County”) have the discretion to call performance bonds posted by a developer to ensure completion of subdivision improvements pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute (“A.R.S.”) section 11-821(C) and Coconino County Subdivision Ordinance No. 82-3 (“Ordinance”), section 4.14(A)(2) (May 3, 1982). We hold that AR.S. § 11-821(C) and Ordinance § 4.14(A)(2) allow the County to exercise discretion…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gries v. Plaza Del Rio Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Price v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Brookline Residential, LLC v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. SantillanesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
- Az Public Integrity v. Adrian FontesArizona Supreme Court · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.