Legal Opinion
Vaizburd v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 3, 2000No. Civ.A. 99CV3536 DGTPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TRAGER, District Judge.
The City of New York and the Department of Parks and Recreation of the City of New York (collectively, “City defendants”); the State of New York, the Department of State, the Department of Environmental Conservation, and the Office of General Services (collectively, “State defendants”); and the United States of America have moved to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiffs pro se, Linda and Arkady Vaizburd (“Vaizburds”), under Rule 12(b)(1) and (6). 1 The Vaizburds allege various causes of action in their eight count complaint (some easier to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- CASTANZA v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Livant v. CliftonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Canzoneri v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- New Holland Village Condominium v. DeStaso Enterprises Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Callahan v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.