Legal Opinion

W. S. Conrad Co. v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1915No. Nos. 19,281—(195)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the municipal court for St. Paul to recover $324. The case was tried before Finehout, J., who denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and a jury which returned a verdict for the amount demanded. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Dibell, C.

Action by plaintiff to recover damages for injuries to its automobile sustained in a collision with a street car of tbe defendant. Tbe plaintiff claimed general damages in tbe sum of $218 and special damages in tbe sum of $106, a total of $324, and tbis was tbe amount of tbe verdict. Tbe defendant appeals from tbe order denying its alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial.

1. Tbe accident occurred at tbe intersection of Seventh and Cedar streets in tbe city of St. Paul. Tbe street car was going westerly on tbe northerly track and made a turn to the north into Cedar. Tbe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graves v. BonnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Larson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cloyes v. PlaatjeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  2. Menefee v. Raisch Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Probasco v. Crane Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  5. Allen v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API