Nadlin v. Starick

In this taxpayer’s suit, John Q. Public asks what right Mr. Starick has to legalize gambling. The answer is that he has no right to do so. The court will explain why not and point out the dangers of such personalized law.

The legal problem is whether the court shall temporarily restrain the defendant, Herbert Starick, Manager of the City of Dayton, from enforcing the regulations and controls he estab*36lished for tbe conduct of bingo in tbe City of Dayton and for tbe use of the Division of Police to enforce his program.

No other question is involved.

TAXPAYER’S ACTION

The plaintiff, as a taxpayer,…