Legal Opinion
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 24, 1998No. B122333PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P.
Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition to compel respondent superior court to vacate its order of May 20, 1998, granting the challenge of real party in interest, Park Northridge Homeowners Association (hereinafter Park Northridge), to Judge Ronald E. Cappai. The primary issue in this proceeding is whether a party has exhausted its right pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6, subdivision (3), to one peremptory challenge per action or proceeding, when its peremptory challenge has been dismissed as untimely.1
Factual and Procedural Background
On April…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lennane v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Urias v. Harris Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hickox v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR CTY. OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frisk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Grant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Hemingway v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. LetteerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.