Legal Opinion
People v. Letteer
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 2002No. H021920PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WUNDERLICH, J.
I. Statement of the Case
In 1997, defendant Mark Duane Letteer pleaded guilty to possession and being under the influence of methamphetamine and admitted having three prior felony convictions that qualified as strikes under the “Three Strikes” law. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11377, subd. (a), 11550, subd. (a); Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12.) At sentencing, the Honorable John T. Ball dismissed two of defendant’s strikes in furtherance of justice (see Pen. Code, § 1385; People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 [53 Cal.Rptr.2d 789, 917 P.2d 628]) and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- K.R. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Dieudonne v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. HsuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.