Legal Opinion

Spring v. Bradford

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 12, 2017No. 1 CA-CV 15-0505PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CATTANI, Judge:

¶ 1 In this appeal, we consider whether and how the rule of exclusion of witnesses under Rule 615 of the Arizona Rules of Evidence applies to expert witnesses. We hold that, by its terms, Rule 615 does not automatically exempt expert witnesses from exclusion. The superior court may, however, exercise its discretion under subsection (c) of the rule—an exemption for “essential” witnesses—to allow an expert witness to observe other testimony (or to review transcribed testimony).

¶ 2 The defendant doctor in this medical malpractice case did not request that his expert…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Gene Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  5. Lena v. Morvant, Etc. v. Construction Aggregates CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nia v. NiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Emma Spring v. Timothy R. BradfordArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Emma Spring v. Timothy R. BradfordArizona Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API