Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 7, 1998No. 1214-97PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted Appellant of capital murder. The State did not seek the death penalty, so Appellant was sentenced to confinement for life. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Hernandez v. State, 952 S.W.2d 59 (Tex.App.—Austin 1997).

On appeal, Appellant alleged his oral and written confessions were involuntary. He asked the Court of Appeals to review the issue de novo, but the Court of Appeals declined and followed DuBose v. State, 915 S.W.2d 493 (Tex.Cr.App.1996).

The second ground of Appellant’s petition for discretionary…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. DuBose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997

4Cited by113 opinions

  1. Apolinar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. State v. Read, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  3. Reyes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  4. Gomes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. Jimenez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API