Legal Opinion
Woodson v. Winchester
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1911No. Civ. No. 783PublishedCited by 15 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to foreclose defendant’s right to purchase the lands described in the complaint.
A second amended answer was attacked by a motion to strike out many of its averments and by a general and special demurrer. The motion was granted as to a considerable portion of the answer and, after it had been thus shorn, the demurrer was sustained. Defendant making no further attempt to answer, plaintiff submitted his proofs and had judgment as prayed for in the complaint. The appeal is from this judgment on bill of exceptions.
The contract bears date September 16, 1907, and relates to certain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Holton v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hills Transportation Co. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lesperance v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Swasey v. De L'EtancheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Allen v. RamsayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- State v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.