Legal Opinion
Lesperance v. North American Aviation, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1963No. Civ. 26938PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
A general demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. He has appealed from the ensuing judgment of dismissal.
Plaintiff’s grievance grows out of the termination of his employment by the Roeketdyne Division of North American Aviation. Appearing in propria persona he seeks to recover damages for defamation, interference with contract rights, mental anguish, maintenance of a plant with improper working conditions, fraud, false representations, and conspiracy.
The first and second causes of action may be considered together since they essentially deal with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Beck v. PrupisSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.