AMUSEMENT INDUSTRY, INC. v. Stern
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion [DI 448] of defendants Stern, FRG Corp., Frenkel and LTA to dismiss the third amended complaint. Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein, in an extensive Report and Recommendation [DI 551] recommended that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. The only objection is by plaintiffs, who object only with part of the last sentence of footnote 5 in the report which they concede is not necessary to the conclusion reached.
Accordingly, I adopt the report and recommendation without passing on plaintiffs’ point…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Financial Guaranty Insurance v. Putnam Advisory Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Mazzola v. Roomster Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Silvercreek Management, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. Midland Avenue Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Silvercreek Mgmt., Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.