Legal Opinion

AMUSEMENT INDUSTRY, INC. v. Stern

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 11, 2011No. 07 Civ. 11586(LAK)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion [DI 448] of defendants Stern, FRG Corp., Frenkel and LTA to dismiss the third amended complaint. Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein, in an extensive Report and Recommendation [DI 551] recommended that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. The only objection is by plaintiffs, who object only with part of the last sentence of footnote 5 in the report which they concede is not necessary to the conclusion reached.

Accordingly, I adopt the report and recommendation without passing on plaintiffs’ point…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Financial Guaranty Insurance v. Putnam Advisory Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Mazzola v. Roomster Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Silvercreek Management, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. Amusement Industry, Inc. v. Midland Avenue Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Silvercreek Mgmt., Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API