Legal Opinion
Kramer Motors, Inc. v. British Leyland, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1980No. 78-3332PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Per curiam
Kramer Motors, Inc., a Santa Monica imported automobile dealer, lost its supply of Triumph automobiles in 1974 after the importer, British Leyland Motors, Inc. (BLMI), revised its marketing plan for British Leyland cars in the United States. In addition to other litigation,1 Kramer commenced this action against three British corporations2 which Kramer claimed had conspired to put it out of business in violation of federal law. Kramer appeals a judgment of dismissal for want of jurisdiction.
In Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co., 556 F.2d 406 (9th Cir. 1977), we reviewed the due…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Joan C. Howard v. Everex Systems, Inc., Steven L.W. Hui Michael C.Y. Wong Wong's International (Holdings) Limited Gatcombe Corp. N.V.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Harris Rutsky & Co. Insurance Services, Inc. v. Bell & Clements LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Company, Ltd., and Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Calvert v. HuckinsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.