Legal Opinion
Calvert v. Huckins
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 13, 1995No. Civ. S-94-0503 WBS JFMPublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHUBB, District Judge.
The parties are again before the court on defendants’, Centex Corporation (“Centex”) and Centex Construction Products, Inc. (“CXP”), motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). 1 A hearing on the motion was originally held on November 7, 1994. At that time the court granted plaintiffs additional time to conduct further discovery relating to jurisdiction over the defendants. The discovery having been conducted, and the parties given additional opportunity to brief and argue their positions, the court grants…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jose F. Escude Cruz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Sher v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Harris Rutsky & Co. Insurance Services, Inc. v. Bell & Clements LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.