Legal Opinion
Harris Rutsky & Co. Insurance Services, Inc. v. Bell & Clements Limited
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 12, 2003No. 01-57053PublishedCited by 220 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
328 F.3d 1122
HARRIS RUTSKY & CO. INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., d/b/a American Special Risk Insurance Services, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BELL & CLEMENTS LIMITED; Bell & Clements (London) Limited, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-57053.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted December 4, 2002.
Filed May 12, 2003.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Stephen F. Harbison, Argue Pearson Harbison & Myers, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause for the appellant. Thomas R. Schalow, Argue Pearson Harbison & Myers LLP,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by220 opinions
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Pebble Beach Company, a California General Partnership v. Michael Caddy, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Learjet, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Menken v. EmmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Nilo D. Tuazon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.