Wing v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellant Wing was convicted of burglary and theft of property and was sentenced as an habitual offender to prison terms of 35 and 25 years. The sufficiency of the evidence is not questioned. The appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying a motion for a continuance and in directing the sentences to be served consecutively.
First, the issue of the requested continuance. Wing’s “rap sheet,” of which defense counsel was aware weeks before trial, showed ten or more prior felony convictions. The prosecutor at first charged four or more prior convictions,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Acklin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Wing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
3Cited by16 opinions
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Teague v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Rodgers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.