Legal Opinion

Wing v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 27, 1985No. CA CR 84-159PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Judge.

The appellant, Donald Eugene Wing, appeals from a conviction of burglary and theft of property and sentences of twenty years and ten years, to be served consecutively. Appellant’s two points for reversal are that (1) the court failed to exercise discretion in sentencing appellant to consecutive rather than concurrent terms; and (2) the court erred in using a constitutionally invalid felony conviction for enhancement purposes under the Habitual Offender Statute. We reverse.

For his first point, the appellant relies upon Acklin v. State, 270 Ark. 879, 606 S.W.2d 594…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Acklin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Cavin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Fisk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Wing v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Throneberry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Blagg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Davidson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API