Acklin v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The only question here is whether the trial judge actually exercised his discretionary authority in directing that three three-year sentences imposed by the jury should run consecutively rather than concurrently. We are unable to say there was an exercise of discretion and therefore remand the case for resentencing.
Acklin pleaded not guilty to three charges of forgery, but on the witness stand he freely admitted his guilt and attributed the forgeries to a number of things, including his loss of a job, his separation and divorce, and his inability to support his five…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robert Michael Woosley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Hal Clemit Derrick, United States of America v. Burnett Wendell FinchumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Orman v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
3Cited by35 opinions
- Burt Beavers v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Beed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Swaite v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.