Legal Opinion

Boin v. Spreckels Sugar Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1909No. S.F. No. 4977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff had been employed in defendant’s beet-sugar factory in Monterey County. He was assigned first to work in the press room, where his duty was to shake out of the press some sort of material after it was formed into cakes or slabs. He testified that he did not know what the cakes contained and that he did not handle them. No one told him, he said, that there was any danger in handling the substance which came from the press, and he testified that he knew absolutely nothing about the caustic properties of the material composing the cakes. After working at the press for about two weeks…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Baxter v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Williams v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Power v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CarithersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Gillespie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Thomas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Davis v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API