Legal Opinion

Davis v. Livingston

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1926No. 4719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The defendant in error moves to strike out the bill of exceptions and to dismiss the writ of error. The ease, a law action, was tried before the judge on written stipulation waiving a jury, and on April 22, 1924, judgment was rendered in' favor of the defendant in error. On April 29, 1924, the plaintiff in error served and filed a notice of his intention to move for a new trial. On the the same day the attorneys for the respective parties filed a stipulation that the motion for a new trial might be heard and determined in Los Angeles before the court at a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Olivit BrothersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Greyerbiehl v. Hughes Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. Camden Iron Works Co. v. SaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. OneBeacon Insurance v. Haas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Mortgage Loan Co. v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BanionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Kline v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API