Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Carithers

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1909No. L.A. No. 2380PublishedCited by 48 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered after verdict of a jury revoting probate of the last will of William D. Carithers, deceased, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. The contention is made on behalf of respondent that, by the failure to argue orally the motion for new trial, the said motion was waived. This is an interesting question which, in view of the conclusions reached by us with reference to the appeal from the judgment, need not be here considered at great length. This court has decided recently, however, that mere failure to present oral argument on the motion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. McConnachieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Donovan v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. In Re the Estate of BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. In Re Estate of CalefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Llewellyn v. CheesewrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API