Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Burks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1908No. 15,635PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Neosho district court; Leander Still-well, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff recovered damages suffered on account of the death of her husband, Warren A. Burks, occasioned by the negligence' of the defendant. At the time he was injured the deceased was engaged in an attempt to make a coupling of freight-cars. On the trial of the action it became material whether the coupling device of one of the cars was defective, and whether the defendant had notice of the defect.

Previous to the time the case was called for trial the plaintiff served upon the defendant a notice demanding an inspection and copy, or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Insurance Company v. MahoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co. v. DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Krogg v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Cully v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Friedman v. City of Forest CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Lehan v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hull v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Flanigan v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API