Waggoner v. Haralampus
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MENGLER, J., Pro Tempore.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendants Haralampus and Hansen entered on a jury verdict in an action at law for money had and received. Involuntary nonsuits were granted as to all other defendants.
The plaintiff, as buyer, and the defendants Haralampus and Hansen, as sellers, on January 15, 1973, signed an earnest money receipt for the sale of a restaurant known as Hara’s. The earnest money receipt provided in part: "Sale is contingent on approval of city license and OLCC commission.” One thousand dollars was paid as earnest money. The balance of a $20,000…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Salem Traction Co. v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Wood Industrial Corporation v. RoseOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Huszar v. CERTIFIED REALTY COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Howard v. SloanOregon Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ahern v. GaussoinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1985
- Duty v. First State Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Allison v. DolichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Chambers v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees International Union, AFL-CIODistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.