Howard v. Sloan
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an action for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff as he was driving by defendants’ building at the time of an explosion of dynamite in its basement. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that defendants were re-' sponsible for the explosion. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of involuntary nonsuit, based upon a holding by the trial court that plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient. We affirm.
The building involved in this case was the Helm Building in Portland. At the time of the explosion it was owned by a joint venture, including defendant Sloan, defendant Bennett and Donald E. Hurrle,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Cronn v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Bedell Et Ux. v. GoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- McConnell v. HerronOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- First Nat. Bank v. Fire Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berki v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. KrummacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Waggoner v. HaralampusOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. NashCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. KrummacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973