Legal Opinion
Northern Arapaho v. State of Wyoming
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 23, 2004No. 02-8026, 02-8031PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
The Northern Arapaho Tribe brought an action seeking a declaration that the state of Wyoming failed to negotiate in good faith with the Tribe in violation of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701 el seq. Partially granting the Tribe’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, the district court held that Wyoming failed to negotiate in good faith with regard to Calcutta and parimutuel wagering and ordered the parties to complete a compact within sixty days. The court further held that casino-style gaming and slot machine wagering were against Wyoming…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. State of Connecticut and William A. O'neill, Governor of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Aspenwood Investment Co. v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dalton v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- State of Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Michigan Gambling Opposition (MichGO) v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Dewberry v. KulongoskiDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.