Legal Opinion
Michigan Gambling Opposition (MichGO) v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 23, 2007No. Civil Action 05-01181 (JGP)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PENN, District Judge.
This comes before the Court on the United States Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment [# 33] (“Def.’s Mot.”), and the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawato-mi Indians’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative for Summary Judgment [# 32] (“Intv.’s Mot.”). 1
Defendants argue, among other things, that there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute which merit this case proceeding to trial. Def.’s Memo, at 1. For nearly identical reasons, intervenor also argues for dismissal of the Complaint. Intv.’s Mot., at 2.
Pla…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. PatchakSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Center for Food Safety v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Michigan Gambling Opposition v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Patchak v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- PATCHAK v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.