Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. Uhrich

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1922No. 23,669PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*644The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one for compensation for personal injuries, sustained by the plaintiff in the course of employment by the defendants. The plaintiff recovered, and the defendants appeal.

The jury returned the following special findings of fact:

“Q. 1. What injury, if any, do you find plaintiff received to his first and second fingers and to his thumb of his left hand, by reason of the accident in controversy? A. (a) To his first finger? Lost entire finger, (b) To his second finger? Lost entire finger, (c) To his thumb? Lost at least 50% use of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stefan v. Red Star Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Emry ex rel. Emry v. CripesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Anderson v. Commonwealth Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lane v. Sonken-Galamba Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Fronk v. Ajax Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. McKarnin v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API