Legal Opinion

Fronk v. Ajax Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1926No. 27,098PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one for compensation. The plaintiff recovered and the defendants appeal.

The plaintiff was a driller and tool dresser employed by the defendants. It was plaintiff’s duty to heat drilling tools for sharpening over a forge which was heated with fuel oil and steam. On May 14, 1925, while lighting the forge for heating the drilling tools and while engaged in the regular course of his employment, the oil forge exploded and blew burning oil over the front of his clothing. He jumped into a slush pond near by and extinguished the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gorrell v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Stefan v. Red Star Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Roper v. HammerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Tierney ex rel. Tierney v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Brooks v. WeikSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peschka v. Wilkinson Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Gilbreath v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API