Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hurwit v. Prudential I. Co. of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1941No. Civ. 12825Published

1Dissent

McCOMB, J., Dissenting.

I dissent: Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before a jury in an action to enforce an insurance policy providing for payments to plaintiff if he be continuously and permanently unable to engage in any occupation or perform any work for any kind of compensation of financial value, defendant appeals.

The essential facts are:

Defendant issued a policy of insurance to plaintiff containing among others the following provisions:

“If the Insured shall become totally and permanently disabled, either physically or mentally, from any cause whatsoever, to such- an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Thigpen v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Garms v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Wright v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API