Legal Opinion

Red Eagle v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1945No. 31575PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

A motion to dismiss this appeal was denied by order duly entered on February 8, 1944. This motion has been renewed in the brief of appel-lees. The principal ground of the motion is the alleged insufficiency of the petition in error, both in form and sub stance, to confer jurisdiction on this court. Reliance is placed on the decision in Marvel v. White, 5 Okla. 736, 50 P. 87, wherein the appeal was dis-mised for insufficiency of the petition in error. An examination of the opinion cited discloses no similarity of the petition in error there considered to the one in the instant case. Here the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harjo v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Jones v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Sawyer v. SawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Marvel v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Price v. ClementSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. LCR, INC. v. Linwood PropertiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 379Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. In Re Estate of RedwineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API