In re Hirsch
District Court, S.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. On opposition to bankrupt’s application for discharge.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The discharge of the above bankrupts is opposed (1) upon the ground that the court has no jurisdiction, where, as in this case, the application is for the adjudication of a partnership and there are no assets; (2) on the ground that assets of the firm were concealed and that various false oaths have been made in regard thereto. Although these objections are mutually exclusive of each other, I shall briefly consider each.
The petition, signed by all the co-partners, was filed on October 27, 1898, stating that the bankrupts composed the firm of S. Hirseh & Sons; that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re MeyersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- Crompton v. ConklingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1877
- In re CrockettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1868
- Crompton v. ConklingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1877
- In re AltmanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ashton v. Cameron County Water Improvement Dist. No. OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- In re McGurnDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1900
- In re J. M. Ceballos & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1908
- Vulcan Sheet Metal Co. v. North Platte Valley Irr. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Holmes v. Baker & HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.