Legal Opinion
In re J. M. Ceballos & Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 27, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On petition and answers.
1Opinion of the Court
TANNING, District Judge.
The petitioner, Anderson C. Wilson, on September 4, 190I, filed his petition alleging that he and the respondents, Juan M. Ceballos and John S. Fiske, have been partners, doing business under the firm name of J. M. Ceballos & Co.; that the firm had its principal place of business in New York City until October 10, 1906, when the partnership business was discontinued; that his residence and domicile has been, for the greater portion of six months next preceding the filing of his petition, in New Jersey; that the partnership is insolvent and owes'debts in excess of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- Ludowici Roofing Tile Co. v. Pennsylvania Inst. for Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- In re HirschDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- In re LaughlinDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Ashton v. Cameron County Water Improvement Dist. No. OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- In re Junck & BalthazardDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1909
- In re Samuels & LesserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913
- Vulcan Sheet Metal Co. v. North Platte Valley Irr. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.