In re Crockett
District Court, S.D. New York
[In bankruptcy. In the matter of the petition of Joseph D. Crockett and Christian F. Schramm for an adjudication of bankruptcy of themselves and James C. Jewett, as their copartner.]
1Opinion of the Court
BLATCHFORD, District Judge.
The petitioners set forth in their petition that they and one James C. Jewett are copartners; that the members of the copartnership are unable to pay their debts in full; and that Jewett refuses to join in the petition. The prayer of the petition is that the petitioners and Jewett may be adjudged bankrupts. There are schedules annexed setting forth debts and assets of the copartnership. The answer of Jewett to the petition avers that he has not been a partner .with Crockett since January 1st, 1867; that Schramm is not and never was a copartner with Jewett, or with…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hansen Mercantile Co. v. Wyman, Partridge & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- In re GayDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1910
- In re HaensellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1899
- In re HirschDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- Holmes v. Baker & HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.