Crompton v. Conkling
District Court, S.D. New York
[At law. Action by John Crompton and John C. Dickinson, as assignees in bankruptcy of Almon Miller & Co., against Gur-don Conkling, Jr., and Harriet Goetschius, to recover upon two promissory notes made by the defendants, composing the firm of G. Conkling, Jr., & Co., to the bankrupts. There was a judgment against the defendant Conic-ling (Oase No. 3,408), and he now moves for a new trial.]
1Opinion of the Court
BLATCHFORD, District Judge.
On the 23d of November, 1S72, the bankrupts, composing the firm of A. Miller & Co., were adjudged such, on a petition filed January 28th, 1870. The usual assignment was made to the plaintiffs December 30th, 1872, assigning to them all the property in which the bankrupts were interested, or which they were entitled to have, on the 2Sth of January, 1870. This suit is brought on promissory notes, made by the firm of G. Conkling,. Jr., & Co., a firm composed of the defendants, each dated July 16th, 1S70, and payable, one five months, and the other six months, after…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nutting v. AshcroftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ludowici Roofing Tile Co. v. Pennsylvania Inst. for Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- In re MercurDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1902
- In re HirschDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899