Legal Opinion

Sightsound. Com Inc. v. N2K, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 2003No. 1:98-cv-00118PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER OF COURT

AMBROSE, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court is a Motion by Defendants N2K, Inc. (“N2K”), CDNow, Inc., and CDNowOnline, Inc. (collectively, “CDNow”), seeking summary judgment in this patent infringement case on the grounds that the patents-in-suit are invalid and that the method utilized by Plaintiff in calculating its damages is invalid as a matter of law. Also pending is a Motion by Plaintiff Sightsound.com, Incorporated (“Sightsound”), seeking summary judgment with regard to the affirmative defense and counterclaims of inequitable conduct offered by Defendants.…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rhino Associates, L.P. v. Berg Manufacturing & Sales Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Protective Optics, Inc. v. Panoptx, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. Suzanne Sullivan v. Exact Sciences Corporation, et al.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API