Legal Opinion
Protective Optics, Inc. v. Panoptx, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 23, 2006No. C 05-2732 CRBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BREYER, District Judge.
Protective Optics, Inc. (“Protective”) filed suit against Panoptx, Inc. (“Panoptx”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,062,-688 (“the '688 patent”). The parties filed a Joint Claim Construction Statement asking that the Court construe four claim terms.
BACKGROUND
The '688 patent, entitled “Detachable Eyeglass Foam Shield,” discloses an eye shielding system to prevent liquids and solids from entering the face area behind eyeglasses. The patent was issued May 16, 2000, to Mr. Joseph Vinas. By assignment, Protective Optics, Inc. is the owner of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016