Legal Opinion
Rhino Associates, L.P. v. Berg Manufacturing & Sales Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 14, 2007No. Civil Action 1:04-CV-1611PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CONNER, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the motion (Doc. 142) of plaintiff Rhino Associates, L.P. (“Rhino”) for default judgment against defendant Berg Manufacturing and Sales Corporation (“Berg”). 1 For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
1. Background,
Rhino commenced the instant action on July 22, 2004 alleging willful patent infringement against Berg. (See Doe. 1.) Berg answered the complaint on August 25, 2004 and filed a counterclaim against Rhino asserting that the patent at issue (patent no. Re. 34,889, hereinafter “the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- State Industries, Inc. v. A.O. Smith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Liquid Dynamics Corp. v. Vaughan Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eden Foods, Inc. v. GeorgeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- Freddy S.p.A. v. KalaiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Hoppmann v. Pampered Pets & Plants IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Huntley v. VBIT Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- N.E.C.A. Local Union No. 313 I.B.E.W. Health and Welfare Fund v. KAM Electric, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.