Legal Opinion

Parlow v. Dan Hamm Drayage Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 10, 1965No. 50639PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELBORN, Commissioner.

This is an action by Margaret Parlow for the wrongful death of her husband. John Parlow was employed as a welder by the Ace Metal Products Company which was constructing a tank for Monsanto Chemical Company. Ace engaged a crane and operator for the project from the Dan Hamm Drayage Co. (referred to herein as “Hamm”). Parlow’s death occurred when a portion of the crane collapsed, allowing a metal roof piece being hoisted into place by the crane to fall, carrying Parlow to his death. His widow brought this action against Hamm, relying upon the res ipsa loquiture doctrine.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Jake C. Byers, Inc. v. J.B.C. InvestmentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Wingate Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Lester E. Cox Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. School District of Independence, No. 30 v. U.S. Gypsum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Figueroa Vda. de Delgado v. Boston Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1971
  5. Keller v. International Harvester Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API