Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 2017No. 252PA14-2PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This is the second time that this case has made its way to this Court, and yet our resolution of the present appeal does not represent afinal ruling on the merits. Instead, for the reasons discussed herein, we reverse and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for an independent assessment of whether that court need and should invoke its discretion under Rule 2 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure in order to reach the merits of one of defendant’s substantive issues on appeal.

In light of the several previous opinions from this Court and the Court of Appeals in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Steingress v. SteingressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. Gayton-BarbosaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. BursellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  2. In re: I.W.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. GentleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. Gouch v. RotunnoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API