Legal Opinion

Rotering v. Rotering

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), entered September 8, 2003, which granted the mother’s motion, made at the close of the father’s evidence during the fact-finding hearing, to dismiss his petition to relocate to Fargo, North Dakota, with their children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

When reviewing a custodial parent’s request to relocate, the Family Court’s primary focus must be the best interests of the children (see Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Kime v. KimeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martino v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Rubio v. RubioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Fegadel-Anderson v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Christy v. ChristyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Christy v. ChristyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API