Legal Opinion

Christy v. Christy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

On a motion to dismiss a petition, made at the close of the petitioner’s case, the facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the petitioner, accepting his or her proof as true and affording him or her every favorable inference that reasonably can be drawn therefrom (see Matter of Mineo v Mineo, 96 AD3d 1617 [2012]; Matter of Stone v Wyant, 8 AD3d 1046 [2004]).

Here, even when viewed in the light most favorable to the mother, the evidence she presented on her case failed to establish, prima facie, that her proposal to relocate to Arizona with the subject children was in their best…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. McBryde v. BoddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Martino v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Harrsch v. JesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Rubio v. RubioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API