Legal Opinion

Kime v. Kime

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), dated September 28, 2001, as denied his motion for joint custody of the parties’ daughter, and the defendant cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied her motion for permission to relocate with the parties’ daughter to Florida.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

When reviewing a custodial parent’s request to relocate, the court’s primary focus must be on the best interests of the child (see Tropea v…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Miller v. PipiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Laura A. K. v. Timothy M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Forzano v. ScuderiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Giraldo v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Martino v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Confort v. NicolaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Vega v. PollackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Haughton v. TsangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API