Legal Opinion

Fegadel-Anderson v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Kiedaisch, J.), entered October 20, 2000, as denied, after a hearing, her petition to relocate to the State of Florida, or in the alternative, to Rochester, New York, with the parties’ children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the mother’s contentions, the record provides a sound and substantial basis for the Family Court’s determination that it was not in the best…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Confort v. NicolaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Kime v. KimeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Rotering v. RoteringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Rutigliano v. RutiglianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rubio v. RubioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Fegadel v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API