Legal Opinion

Driehaus v. Walworth County

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 1, 2009No. 2008AP947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

¶ 1. Richard H. Driehaus appeals from an order denying his writ of certiorari petition that a zoning variance decision of the Walworth County Board of Adjustment (the Board) be reversed. Driehaus contends that the Board applied an incorrect theory of law, exceeded its jurisdiction, and arbitrarily determined that his request for an area variance to a sideyard setback should be denied. Driehaus also argues that his right to due process was violated when a judicial rotation placed his petition for writ of certiorari before a new judge without notice to the parties. We affirm the order of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  2. Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Brown County v. Shannon R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. Kenosha County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Acevedo v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Michael Dwyer v. City of MononaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
  4. Oneida Seven Generations Corporation v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Oneida Seven Generations Corporation v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API