State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJanine P. Geske, J.
¶ 1. On this review we consider whether the Kenosha County Board of Adjustment (Board) properly applied the legal standard for determining unnecessary hardship in order to grant a petition for an area variance. The Board determined that the variance applicant, Ms. Janet Huntoon, would suffer unnecessary hardship if she were denied a variance enabling her to build a deck extending into the protected shoreyard of Hooker Lake. The circuit court, the Honorable Michael Fisher presiding, upheld the Board's decision, and the court of appeals affirmed. We conclude that the legal standard of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Buechel v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Zealy v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Thompson v. PLANNING COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- BELVOIR FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. INC. v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. Outagamie County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Forest County v. GoodeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Waushara County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.