State Ex Rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.
¶ 1. We are called upon in this case to reconsider the legal standard by which zoning boards of adjustment measure "unnecessary hardship" when determining whether to grant area zoning variances.
¶ 2. The legislature has by statute vested local boards of adjustment with broad discretionary power to authorize variances where the strict enforcement of zoning regulations results in unnecessary hardship to individual property owners. "Unnecessary hardship," however, is not defined in the statute. It has fallen to courts to give meaning to the term.
¶ 3. The present, need to revisit the meaning of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. Outagamie County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Anchor Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Equal Opportunities CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ottman v. Town of PrimroseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- FAS, LLC v. Town of Bass LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Waushara County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re StadsvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Lamar Central Outdoor, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.